ID Your Challenger to Maximize Value at the Texas Hold’em Poker Table
January 24th, 2014 by Deacon

There are several types of Hold’em Poker gambler, and, needless to say, a lot of levels of experience between those players. Texas hold em the card game is similar to pushing spaghetti around a dish – some will acquire more, others will have less and the house always takes a piece. The statistics of cards over time determine that we all have the same chances. The key to maximizing our potential gains is to quickly identify your opponent kind and skill level. If it is possible to correctly identify your opponent then you can be able to change your playing design to maximize your win, and just as substantially, minimize your loss.

Let us review the various playing styles that you simply will appear across in an average Holdem Poker cash game. Players will either be:

� Rocks

� Tight Players

� Calling Stations

� Maniacs

And within these styles you are going to locate a range of aggression that goes from passive to aggressive. What follows are a number of strategic hints and tips to support you bet on against each and every form of poker player in an on-line environment.


Rocks are the most typical sort of Texas hold em Player. They may be the easiest to beat and usually are inexperienced new gamblers who believe the casino game revolves around the cards that are dealt. It’s also probably the most natural playing design and so you may arrive across them regularly. These are the individuals you need to look to wager on against. Controlled aggression will be the method to proceed. Bet at these gamblers when flops appear ugly and they’ll most probably fold. If they re-raise you in return, step aside and let them take the hand, coming correct back at them following round. A rock who has been sitting folding the last twenty hands, only to appear out betting, may be the easiest read of all. Should you can’t see them coming then I’d suggest you take up a different game.

Tight Players

Tight gamblers are usually battle hardened. The difference in between a tight gambler and a rock is the fact that they understand the need to come out a lot more usually, with the occasional bluff here and there. Additional importantly they usually use the time spent sitting out, to determine opponent characteristics so that you can bet on their weaknesses. The very best of all players sit in this category – Tight Aggressive No Limit Holdem players ought to be identified early on and avoided in any way cost. Discover one and you need to re-examine your table selection (yes you must move table). Real life examples of this variety of player would be Howard Lederer and Erick Lindgren.

Calling Stations

Calling stations present an interesting betting type and would be the 2nd most common form you will uncover in online poker. By definition fairly weak, these players rarely take the initiative and thereby have to depend on the luck of running up against an aggressive gambler while holding the nut or near nut hand. A lot more generally than not these people will lose because they may be:

1) Betting their cards and not their opponent
Two) Have no initiative

3) Often depend on card catching strategies

It’s worth pointing out at this stage that card catching can be a negative idea in practically any circumstances (except as part of a semi-bluff wager on).


Maniacs are a rare breed of player seldom witnessed in low limit or tournament Hold’em Poker games. They have no fear of losing, indeed it’ll appear like they wish to, and it truly is this that sets them apart from most players online today. Complicated to wager on in opposition to, these opponents rely on your fear of losing your stack to gain chips. Usually observed with large chip stacks relative to the table, Maniacs will bet large regularly, and whatever hand you pick to wager on, it’s probably which you will have being prepared to go all-in with it. No card catching towards these opponents – should you try you’ll be punished.

The identification of Maniacs is easy, as is your assault on their betting style. Clearly the weakness these players have is the fact that they’re susceptible to significant pocket pairs (Aa, King-King, Qq, even Ak). The problems is that you will most likely have to wait a excellent number of cards prior to you receive to wager on such a hand. Maniacs are far from stupid (they typically evolve in understanding terms from Rocks or Calling Stations that have read Doyle Brunson’s Super System books and progressed from there. To hit them correctly you need to either acquire lucky early on with the large pair or wager on sufficient cards so you aren’t identified as a waiting Rock (obviously you do not want them to acquire out of your way when the time is right).

When you beat an intense Maniac once, you are going to come across they go on Tilt really easily, which provides further chance for the brave. I remember hitting one for $800 from two hundred dollars in three hands because he went all-in three times in a row with no cards at all. He incorrectly judged that I would fold instead of re-stake my entire winnings on every of the next 2 poker hands. Fortunately for me they were fairly solid starting hands in the circumstances but I can tell you it’s not easy going all-in pre-flop for 500 dollars with just King Jack. I would be mad to do that in any other circumstance except I felt I had a excellent read on the player kind and his hand which turned out to become ninety two unsuited didn’t stand up.

Hopefully you’ll observe betting types and appear to pick off Rocks and Calling Stations. Should you are available up towards a tight (particularly Tight Aggressive) gambler, with no other easy to beat gamblers close to, you really should move on. I’ve been at several tables where the negative gamblers have lost and left, the very good ones remain, and one off those triggers the table’s break up by saying "no easy money here, the only winner will likely be the rake, let’s move on." If you have not had this said to you, or you have not made the statement yourself then consider that you simply may be a fish.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa